Shareholders’ Decision Outside the General Meeting of Shareholders Without Unanimous Approval

Court Decree No.: 335/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Jkt.Sel

Shareholders Decision

Navigation

Executive Summary

This case highlights the risks of making corporate decisions outside the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) without full shareholder approval. Acting on behalf of an aggrieved shareholder, we successfully challenged the decision in court.

The shareholders’ decision was annulled, and the shareholder rights were fully restored.

Situation

Under the Limited Liability Company Law (UU PT) and the Articles of Association (AOA), decisions outside the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) require unanimous approval. In this case, only 2 of 3 shareholders agreed, but the company proceeded by using the wrong documents to make the shareholder’s decision deed, harming the dissenting shareholder.  

Complication

The company is now in bankruptcy, and a receiver has been appointed to represent the interests of the creditors. The appointed receiver intervened in the ongoing proceeding.

Question

  1. Can a shareholder’s decisions made with the wrong documents be challenged during a bankruptcy process?

  2. How does the involvement of a receiver affect shareholder rights and legal proceedings?

Findings

  1. Violation of Shareholder Rights
    The shareholder’s decision made using the wrong documents, breaching the Limited Liability Company Law (Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas/UU PT) and the Articles of Association (AOA).

  2. Receiver's Role
    The receiver, representing creditors' interests, complicated the proceedings by intervening during the case.

  3. Impact on the Shareholders
    Submission of the wrong documents harmed the dissenting shareholder, further escalating the dispute.

Answer

The court annulled the decision due to non-compliance with legal requirements, despite the company’s bankruptcy status and the receiver’s intervention. This upheld the rights of the dissenting shareholder, emphasizing that bankruptcy does not absolve a company from adhering to shareholder rights and legal procedures.

Recommendation and Conclusion

  1. Adherence to Legal Standards
    Ensure all corporate decisions, including those outside the GMS, comply with the UU PT and AOA to avoid disputes.

  2. Stakeholder Communication
    Maintain transparent communication with all shareholders and creditors to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts.

  3. Collaboration with Receivers
    Work closely with the appointed receiver to balance shareholder and creditor interests during bankruptcy.

For businesses, involving all shareholders in critical decisions ensures transparency and stability. Adhering to legal frameworks safeguards operations, reduces risks, and builds stakeholder trust.

With our experience, we may become a valuable partner to assist you in your situation. If you encounter a similar case, feel free to contact us for consultation at putranto@putranto-alliance.com or by filling out the form below.

Share to your network

Contact Us

A response to the inquiry will be sent to your email within 2 working days.

This Website Is Using Cookies

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.

We help resolve your issues

We respond within 2 working days

Thank you for visiting

Need professional help?